Board 1: -refer to the Canadian Architect precedents outlined already especially in terms of drawing convention and labelling -very little organization as a comprehensive layout; clearly missing line work and has advanced very little from last week -line up your materials to showcase an awareness of how the drawings relate to each other; plans usually line up with elevations which in turn ultimately can transition and line up with sections -many comments spoken about last time have not been addressed; the more one looks at the drawings (i.e. the bottom right elevation), it would seem that the project not only gets thinner each time it is shown but reveals sloppiness (i.e. the junction of the handrail at the first step); canopies of the trees would also be useful in showing not only where they are but help inform what they will be in the digital model
Board 2/3: -comments are all relevant and surprisingly little has advanced since this has been posted up in the past (i.e. precision in the butterfly roof drawings, line work, rendering matters, etc.); is there a missing board or two? -there still is a big question about how the structure works; this will be critical in making the model; very incomplete, especially in the resolution of the interiors -materials in rendering still have to either come close to reality in terms of scale or be done by hand to make it understood as iconographic -furnishings are needed but more importantly, consider the lighting and support materials in the ceiling that will make this stronger
Board 1:
ReplyDelete-refer to the Canadian Architect precedents outlined already especially in terms of drawing convention and labelling
-very little organization as a comprehensive layout; clearly missing line work and has advanced very little from last week
-line up your materials to showcase an awareness of how the drawings relate to each other; plans usually line up with elevations which in turn ultimately can transition and line up with sections
-many comments spoken about last time have not been addressed; the more one looks at the drawings (i.e. the bottom right elevation), it would seem that the project not only gets thinner each time it is shown but reveals sloppiness (i.e. the junction of the handrail at the first step); canopies of the trees would also be useful in showing not only where they are but help inform what they will be in the digital model
Board 2/3:
-comments are all relevant and surprisingly little has advanced since this has been posted up in the past (i.e. precision in the butterfly roof drawings, line work, rendering matters, etc.); is there a missing board or two?
-there still is a big question about how the structure works; this will be critical in making the model; very incomplete, especially in the resolution of the interiors
-materials in rendering still have to either come close to reality in terms of scale or be done by hand to make it understood as iconographic
-furnishings are needed but more importantly, consider the lighting and support materials in the ceiling that will make this stronger